Watson particularly concerned over Baxter colleague infusion pump reliability Indications



West of Scotland NHS Trusts

Medical Physics Technical Management Group

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The following are the minutes of the meeting held on the 2nd February 2005 
 
 

Present Mr. J. Watson

            Mr. A Nixon

            Mr. W. Brash

            Mr. D. Sutton

            Mr. T. Hutchinson

Apologies Mr. T. Holmes

            Mr. A. Henry  
 
 
 

There will be an extraordinary meeting at Royal Alexandra Hospital on the 22nd February at 12.30 pm  
 

The agenga for the meeting following this is as follows 
 
 

      Apologies  
 

      Matters Arising 
 

      Benchmarking  
 

      Incidents 
 

      AOCB

 
 

 
 

1.  Electrical Safety Testing Website 
 

      Mr. Watson has contacted Mark Tulley re the website who has put him in contact with Adam Taktak and Malcolm Brown of the IPEM special interest group. Mr. Brash has already sent details of the site to Dr Taktak in response to a questionnaire but has had no reply. Mr. Watson will contact him to pursue. Mr. Brash will provide a zipped copy of the website.  
 

                                                      BB, JW 
 

2. Pay Review Strategy – Agenda for Change 
 

      No job descriptions have yet been submitted by group members. It was decided to have an extraordinary meeting to compare these and to discuss further.   
 

3. Software trial 
 

      Funding had been made available to initiate replacement of MESMIS within Glasgow, however was thought to be inadequate to cover both software and hardware costs. In addition, this had to be spent before end March, and probably precluded the bespoke solution. Pending decision

                                                DS 
 

4.  Benchmarking 
 

      Mr. Hutchison was concerned about consumable expenditure and suggested producing a pie chart to indicate proportions of expenditure for various purchase categories. He will come up with a precise definition of consumables and the group agreed to reply.   
 

Mr. Watson was particularly concerned over the Baxter colleague infusion pump reliability. Indications were that it was significantly more troublesome than the competitors. This was discussed at length and conceded by all. Mr. Brash produced figures indicating the Colleague produced 1.4 unplanned jobs per pump per year, against 0.7 for the competitors, however overall costs were considerably lower. Not to be fobbed off, Mr. Watson wanted comparative figures from other users of number of pumps, costs and number of jobs and Mr. Brash & Mr. Hutchison agreed.    
 

Mr. Brash demonstrated pivot tables in Excel to provide the data, and suggested a date range of 1/1/04 - 31/12/04 for this. Data by all for next normal meeting   

                        TH, JW, BB, All

5.  Physicist Group

 
 

It was felt by all that we should have closer ties with the Technical Managers group. Mr. Brash had been in contact with Mr. Nieman of the group regarding infusion pump reliability  benchmarking and suggested the MPTMG group should contribute to the supplied data which did not include most of the represented areas. Mr. Brash will circulate the data so far, and will collate the responses.

                                                            BB 
 

  1. Expansion of group

 
 

It was suggested that we expand the group to include Alan Henry from Forth Valley. He was invited to this meeting but did not attend. Further expansion to be decided later. 
 

  1. E-procurement BPI

 
 

Mr. Sutton reported that Proact medical were undercutting by Ł5 the Tyco offer price for Nellcor sensors offered in response to  Septembers BPI meeting. This led to some discussion where it was agreed we should have earlier and more technical input. Both Mr. Hutchison and Mr. Sutton had contacted the BPI project team to this end but had no response.  Group to monitor and pursue to raise profile.          All 
 

  1. Endoscope cleaners

 
 

Mr. sutton asked which of the group looked after endoscope cleaners since he had been approached to take on this responsibility. The group felt this was a minefield and was best avoided as being more in line with other sterilisation equipment such as autoclaves etc.Mr. Brash suggested that current guidance for these had changed in January this year (available from www.decontamination.nhsestates.gov.uk/introduction/index.asp)  
 

  1. Eschman

 
 

Mr. Hutchison asked for an opinion on Eschman’s performance lately and the group agreed that support was poor and the equipment, although quite reliable, was getting outdated.   
 

Date of Next Meeting to be arranged at the extraordinary meeting on the 22nd february







"Watson particularly concerned over Baxter colleague infusion pump reliability Indications"
Download links for : << ALZET Osmotic Pumps miniature infusion pumps continuous dosing laboratory animals >>

How to Download
You may need eMule or Bittorrent to download ebook torrents or emule links.

Report Dead Link
Please leave a comment to report dead links, so that someone else may update new links.


Search More...

[share-ebook]Watson particularly concerned over Baxter colleague infusion pump reliability Indications

Google

Related Books


Books related to :

<< ALZET Osmotic Pumps miniature infusion pumps continuous dosing laboratory animals

Available nurse infusion pump pharmacy units Heparin What will be rate infusion >>


The New York Times rss - Digibooks.cn
    [Pressure Regulator Valves (532)] [ Medical Device Actuator (447) ]
  1. Mechanical-EBooks [6866]
  2. Medicine EBooks [5896]
  3. Medical EBooks [2496]
  4. Biologie EBooks [1976]
  5. Chemie EBooks [694]
  6. Biomedical-engineeri EBooks [119]
  7. Mechanical EBooks [98]
  8. ScienceProject EBooks [349]
  9. Neuro-ophthalmology EBooks[132]
  10. health[886]
  11. Mathematics[284]
  12. Physics[278]
  13. Biology[188]
  14. Pharmaceutical
  15. Medicine
  16. engineering[187]
  17. Electric[185]
  18. CivilEngineering[86]
Google

    Watson particularly concerned over Baxter colleague infusion pump reliability Indications

    West of Scotland NHS Trusts

    Medical Physics Technical Management Group

     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    The following are the minutes of the meeting held on the 2nd February 2005 
     
     

    Present Mr. J. Watson

                Mr. A Nixon

                Mr. W. Brash

                Mr. D. Sutton

                Mr. T. Hutchinson

    Apologies Mr. T. Holmes

                Mr. A. Henry  
     
     
     

    There will be an extraordinary meeting at Royal Alexandra Hospital on the 22nd February at 12.30 pm  
     

    The agenga for the meeting following this is as follows 
     
     

          Apologies  
     

          Matters Arising 
     

          Benchmarking  
     

          Incidents 
     

          AOCB

     
     

     
     

    1.  Electrical Safety Testing Website 
     

          Mr. Watson has contacted Mark Tulley re the website who has put him in contact with Adam Taktak and Malcolm Brown of the IPEM special interest group. Mr. Brash has already sent details of the site to Dr Taktak in response to a questionnaire but has had no reply. Mr. Watson will contact him to pursue. Mr. Brash will provide a zipped copy of the website.  
     

                                                          BB, JW 
     

    2. Pay Review Strategy – Agenda for Change 
     

          No job descriptions have yet been submitted by group members. It was decided to have an extraordinary meeting to compare these and to discuss further.   
     

    3. Software trial 
     

          Funding had been made available to initiate replacement of MESMIS within Glasgow, however was thought to be inadequate to cover both software and hardware costs. In addition, this had to be spent before end March, and probably precluded the bespoke solution. Pending decision

                                                    DS 
     

    4.  Benchmarking 
     

          Mr. Hutchison was concerned about consumable expenditure and suggested producing a pie chart to indicate proportions of expenditure for various purchase categories. He will come up with a precise definition of consumables and the group agreed to reply.   
     

    Mr. Watson was particularly concerned over the Baxter colleague infusion pump reliability. Indications were that it was significantly more troublesome than the competitors. This was discussed at length and conceded by all. Mr. Brash produced figures indicating the Colleague produced 1.4 unplanned jobs per pump per year, against 0.7 for the competitors, however overall costs were considerably lower. Not to be fobbed off, Mr. Watson wanted comparative figures from other users of number of pumps, costs and number of jobs and Mr. Brash & Mr. Hutchison agreed.    
     

    Mr. Brash demonstrated pivot tables in Excel to provide the data, and suggested a date range of 1/1/04 - 31/12/04 for this. Data by all for next normal meeting   

                          TH, JW, BB, All

    5.  Physicist Group

     
     

    It was felt by all that we should have closer ties with the Technical Managers group. Mr. Brash had been in contact with Mr. Nieman of the group regarding infusion pump reliability  benchmarking and suggested the MPTMG group should contribute to the supplied data which did not include most of the represented areas. Mr. Brash will circulate the data so far, and will collate the responses.

                                                                BB 
     

    1. Expansion of group

     
     

    It was suggested that we expand the group to include Alan Henry from Forth Valley. He was invited to this meeting but did not attend. Further expansion to be decided later. 
     

    1. E-procurement BPI

     
     

    Mr. Sutton reported that Proact medical were undercutting by Ł5 the Tyco offer price for Nellcor sensors offered in response to  Septembers BPI meeting. This led to some discussion where it was agreed we should have earlier and more technical input. Both Mr. Hutchison and Mr. Sutton had contacted the BPI project team to this end but had no response.  Group to monitor and pursue to raise profile.          All 
     

    1. Endoscope cleaners

     
     

    Mr. sutton asked which of the group looked after endoscope cleaners since he had been approached to take on this responsibility. The group felt this was a minefield and was best avoided as being more in line with other sterilisation equipment such as autoclaves etc.Mr. Brash suggested that current guidance for these had changed in January this year (available from www.decontamination.nhsestates.gov.uk/introduction/index.asp)  
     

    1. Eschman

     
     

    Mr. Hutchison asked for an opinion on Eschman’s performance lately and the group agreed that support was poor and the equipment, although quite reliable, was getting outdated.   
     

    Date of Next Meeting to be arranged at the extraordinary meeting on the 22nd february